Agent Project Control Tower

多 Agent 项目进度控制塔 · Git 驱动 · Cloudflare Pages 部署

Agent

cloud
ID
cloud-openclaw
名称
Cloud OpenClaw (VPS)
机器
cloud
角色
long-running
最近事件时间
2026-06-12T01:20:14Z
最近项目
agent-project-control-tower
事件数
2

事件类型分布

复查 · 2

参与项目(1)

活动时间线

2 个事件
复查 2026-06-12T01:20:14Z · agent-project-control-tower · cloud-openclaw · ACT-8B-review · 通过 · PASS
第二个 Agent 对生成命令试验的复查
Used the ACT-7B command generator to run a second-agent review flow without hand-written multi-line tower.py commands.
原文
Used the ACT-7B command generator to run a second-agent review flow without hand-written multi-line tower.py commands.
复查 2026-06-11T23:48:25Z · agent-project-control-tower · cloud-openclaw · ACT-8-review · 通过 · PASS
第二个 Agent 对 ACT-7 手册的复查
ACT-8 cross-machine onboarding trial PASS. Cloned the tower on a fresh cloud box, ran make all, validated the data path, registered cloud-openclaw, and submitted this review. Three small gaps surfaced: (1) data/ does not exist on a fresh clone, so the very first validate fails; playbook should call out a bootstrap step. (2) tests/smoke.py hardcodes python while the rest of the build uses python3; on Debian/Ubuntu boxes without the python alias, make test fails. (3) make publish-preflight is opt-in and not part of make all; trial agent might assume it is. Otherwise the ACT-7 playbooks and templates were sufficient to drive a real cross-machine onboarding end-to-end with no token / IP / home path / data leak and no public-data touched. Design reason: trial is intentionally cross-machine to exercise docs/MULTI_MACHINE_SETUP.md and the agent/human two-gate model in docs/OPEN_SOURCE_PLAN.md section 11.3.1. Impact analysis: local-hermes can patch the three small gaps with a 1-line data-bootstrap hint, a python-alias hint, and a publish-preflight opt-in clarification. No source code change in any of the three real projects.
原文
ACT-8 cross-machine onboarding trial PASS. Cloned the tower on a fresh cloud box, ran make all, validated the data path, registered cloud-openclaw, and submitted this review. Three small gaps surfaced: (1) data/ does not exist on a fresh clone, so the very first validate fails; playbook should call out a bootstrap step. (2) tests/smoke.py hardcodes python while the rest of the build uses python3; on Debian/Ubuntu boxes without the python alias, make test fails. (3) make publish-preflight is opt-in and not part of make all; trial agent might assume it is. Otherwise the ACT-7 playbooks and templates were sufficient to drive a real cross-machine onboarding end-to-end with no token / IP / home path / data leak and no public-data touched. Design reason: trial is intentionally cross-machine to exercise docs/MULTI_MACHINE_SETUP.md and the agent/human two-gate model in docs/OPEN_SOURCE_PLAN.md section 11.3.1. Impact analysis: local-hermes can patch the three small gaps with a 1-line data-bootstrap hint, a python-alias hint, and a publish-preflight opt-in clarification. No source code change in any of the three real projects.